The idea of a common platform for educational potential is always a debate that is raging in school and college level education in the US. The issue of whether or not a prep school graduate and a public college student are on the same level of basic education is the first step to this debate. The question further transits to the possibility of good career possibilities of a public college student; much lesser a distant education, convicted graduates and even part time or online course degrees being considered far inferior a qualification.
We need to notice the differences between a regular college and an online course with the backdrop of the facilities made available by the current telecommunication and internet technology. These courses are not learn-it-yourself kits sent in large brown envelopes anymore. Peer and faculty interactions and contact sessions have increased the likeliness of these courses to the traditional collegiate education. The number of projects and hand-in assignments are now exactly the same if not more rigorous of a demand to ensure the students spending hours of time towards their education on a daily basis.
This factor in addition to the online services offering assistance for these courses like finance homework help services, together has moved these courses to a whole new league very much close to the traditional education. The overall benefits gained by the student during the graduation are a perfect knowledge of the subject and as much academic excellence displayed by a proper university graduate. The intriguing fact that more number of students, in fact complete their degrees through these courses in comparison to the traditional education has given room for many questions.
The first question on the effectiveness of online education would be whether or not it is really following the academic honesty and ethics as effectively as reinforced by a real time college. Before answering the question of academic honesty in online courses, we shall determine the same in traditional education in colleges and how it is deteriorated. The scenario in a college is a few examiners monitoring hundreds of students sitting in a hall. So the proportion is highly unbalanced and the probability of fraud always exists. On the upside, this system is run by the fear of getting caught by the same probability. However, the real reason for the absence of malpractice is the actual initiative of the students to learn for their careers and future and prove their skill in an exam to themselves and the system.
This was proven by the research and surveys from Lincolnshire University on the effective use of monitoring devices for traditional and cyber education with a sample group using economics homework help services. In other words, the effective possibility of fraud in both scenarios is equal if not a bit steep on the traditional education as there are automated software available to lock all the other operations of a computer and pop quizzes in middle of class sessions to keep the progress of the students high abreast.